1 |
2020-11-11 00:00:00 Comment: • The existing street was paved with cement concrete. In some portion top surface of existing paving observed eroded. The Engineer-in-Charge should re- visit the site & take suitable decision for ex 0%
|
Comment:
|
2022-05-20 00:00:00 Comment: The dimension of R/G was checked near house no 24265 and starting of street
and found proper. Broken frames and cover should be replaced.
The thickness of CC was checked in front of house no 24265 80%
|
2022-03-22 00:00:00
Comment: • The length of the street marked as 208’ in the completion plan provided was checked and found 206’ instead of 208’.
• The rate analysis for CC with 1:8:16 (2" )& CC with 1:8:16 (4") in t100 |